[Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

Hi, I have a 3c905C card. When I try to insmod 3c59x, i get error: Unresolved symbol acpi_wake, acpi_set_pwr_state, pci_drv_unregister, pci_drv_register. Tried to download a copy dated dec 1 from devel/cstein/files/kernels/Dachstein-small/modules/net with same result. Any other p

Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:18:31 -0800 > >Hi, > >I have a 3c905C card. When I try to insmod 3c59x

Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

b's - and did require different > drivers when I was using certain dists. Have you uncommented the pci-scan > module? > > S > > > >From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC

Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

;s are quite different from 905b's - and did require different > > drivers when I was using certain dists. Have you uncommented the pci-scan > > module? > > > > S > > > > > > >From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

Nah - the 59x module supports the 90x series of cards - altho I have had problems with it and 905c's previously... S >From: Stephen Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Leaf-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk >Dat

RE: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

good one. BK -Original Message- From: Jeff Newmiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: March 6, 2002 5:06 PM To: Stephen Lee Cc: Leaf-user Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk On 6 Mar 2002, Stephen Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe I'm missing something

Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

Boyd, > From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:36:39 -0800 > > > Why does 3com have such a confusing numbering system for their > products anyways? 905; 509; 59x?. >From Doland Becker's site : Why do we use names like "Vo

RE: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk

On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Boyd Kelly wrote: > A quick look at the modules for dachstein, oxygen and lrp 2.9.8 don't > have any 3c90x module available. I remember finding one somewhere, but > found that the 3c59x works. Why does 3com have such a confusing > numbering system for their products anyways?