Re: [Leaf-user] Re: Just a Comment

2001-10-07 Thread lonnie
Thanks for the info and I will give it a try as well. Cheers Lonnie Quoting "Richard G. Minutillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But have you tried eth0_IP_EXTRA_ADDRS="146.9.31.42/24 146.9.31.56/24" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > That's very interesting in that when I added > eth0_IP_EXTRA_AD

Re: [Leaf-user] Re: Just a Comment

2001-10-07 Thread Richard G. Minutillo
But have you tried eth0_IP_EXTRA_ADDRS="146.9.31.42/24 146.9.31.56/24" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That's very interesting in that when I added eth0_IP_EXTRA_ADDRS="146.9.31.42 > 146.9.31.56" > > the LRP would not catch either one of them and only traffic directed to the eth0 > ip was caught.

[Leaf-user] Re: Just a Comment

2001-10-07 Thread Richard G. Minutillo
> I have recently set up another Eigerstein Masquerading firewall, but this time > we wanted to try and take advantage of the > > eth0_IP_EXTRA_ADDRS="x.x.x.x" > > The result, at least for us, was that it did not work. We wanted the firewall to > answer to packets coming from this ip addr as we