i've used them for 2-3 years now. they are very good.
fantastic uptime and little or no BS for people
running servers.
brett
--- Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone using them for DSL?
>
> My buddy just got two static ip's (608Kbs/128Kbps)
> and a self-install DSL kit w/external
pn] I have 768K SDSL service w/4 static IPs (using E2B), but haven't run any speed
tests lately.
I'll check it tonight and let you know. I'm quite happy with the reliability of their
service,
and have been using them since Dec 2000. I've had no down time except two short,
announced
maintenanc
Anyone using them for DSL?
My buddy just got two static ip's (608Kbs/128Kbps)
and a self-install DSL kit w/external DSL bridge
for $60/mo.
We did a quick speed test straight into a Win box
at dslreports and got 600Kbps down.
So it's funny how it's capped at 600 like advertised.
My SBC dsl line
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Douthitt
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:50 AM
To: LEAF Users List
Subject: [Leaf-user] Speakeasy
DPG wrote:
> Makes me miss the old days, before Speakeasy moved my POP 800 miles
further
> down the copper, and raised my gatewa
DPG wrote:
> Makes me miss the old days, before Speakeasy moved my POP 800 miles further
> down the copper, and raised my gateway ping from <20 to >100 ms. That move
> put my servers out of business. :( Now I just have an expensive,
> high-latency SDSL line but no servers...
>
> Did I me
