Hi everyone,
Are there pre-built 2.2.19 kernels (or maybe even 2.4) for eigerstein?
Should I even bother trying to upgrade from 2.2.16?
I heard stateful inspection mentioned relative to 2.4 kernels... but how
does that work actually? Does E2B support it?
Thanks
Ricardo
__
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Are there pre-built 2.2.19 kernels (or maybe even 2.4) for eigerstein?
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/wolfstar
> Should I even bother trying to upgrade from 2.2.16?
2.2.19 is more stable, as 2.4 is still being worked out. My last
attempt at compiling 2.4.6 kept en
Thanks for the info
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> 2.2.19 is more stable, as 2.4 is still being worked out. My last
> attempt at compiling 2.4.6 kept ending in failures, which I almost never
> ever saw with 2.2. You might wish to hold back or not; it's up to you.
But then is
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Thanks for the info
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > 2.2.19 is more stable, as 2.4 is still being worked out. My last
> > attempt at compiling 2.4.6 kept ending in failures, which I almost never
> > ever saw with 2.2. You might wish to hold back or
Linux momma 2.2.19 #15 Sat May 26 18:14:56 CEST 2001 i386 unknown
That is from my dachstein router.
HTH,
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user
ein router.
>
> HTH,
> Chris
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] eigerstein2Beta with 2.2.19?
>
>
> > Ricardo Kleema
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Thanks for the info
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> >
> > 2.2.19 is more stable, as 2.4 is still being worked out. My last
> > attempt at compiling 2.4.6 kept ending in failures, which I almost never
> > ever saw with 2.2. You might wish to hold back
