--On Thursday, January 02, 2003 02:57:39 PM -0700 Steve Fink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the output o
--On Thursday, January 02, 2003 02:57:39 PM -0700 Steve Fink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom,
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the ou
Tom,
I modified the configuration more to match the examples on your
website. I must have missed the policy example on the previous
documentation, because I didn't have anything in there.
Here is the output of shorewall status. I still can't get a Win2K
connection to even show an
--On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 7:38 PM -0600 Lynn Avants
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To me, nmap should show udp 500 in the
scan, but this depends on the scan you are running.
If he would have done a udp scan, he would have probably seen hundreds of
open ports -- see Shorewall FAQ #4a. Note
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 05:27 pm, you wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> After much hair pulling, blood-pressure raising, mustache twitching
>
> I am trying to configure Bering in a Road Warrior configuration using (
> I shudder to admit ) Win2k clients.
>
> I've gone through Chad Ca
--On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 4:27 PM -0700 Steve Fink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried to determine whether or not the ports were
open in Shorewall but an iptables -C INPUT -p udp -s 65.114.248.6/24 -d
65.114.249.131:500, only gives me a "Will be implemented real soon ;)"
And it wouldn'
Everyone,
After much hair pulling, blood-pressure raising, mustache twitching
I am trying to configure Bering in a Road Warrior configuration using (
I shudder to admit ) Win2k clients.
I've gone through Chad Carr's instructions about 10 times and various
docs from bo
