Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-16 Thread Tom Eastep
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 04:30, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Plus, I think the > place to state src/dst for ports is in the second sentence. I think > something like the following would be more clear: Thanks for the suggestion -- I've updated both the 2.x and 3.x doc as you suggest. -Tom --

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-15 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Eastep wrote: | -- | http://www1.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Blacklist | http://www1.shorewall.net/2.0/Documentation.htm#Blacklist | | PORTS | | Optional; may onl

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-14 Thread Erich Titl
Tom Tom Eastep wrote: ... > -- > http://www1.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Blacklist > http://www1.shorewall.net/2.0/Documentation.htm#Blacklist > > PORTS > > Optional; may only be given if PROTOCOL is tcp, udp or

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-14 Thread Tom Eastep
On Monday 14 November 2005 19:20, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Tom Eastep wrote: > | On Saturday 12 November 2005 04:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > |> | What's the "right" way to do this in shorewall? > |> > |> Never mind...after testing some blacklist rules (and some sleep!), I > |> noticed th

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-14 Thread Tom Eastep
On Monday 14 November 2005 19:20, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > Next up...trying to get IPSec working on debian with a patched kernel and > iptables. I've got everything compiled and the kernel even runs (thanks to > tips at the shorewall site!), I just haven't had time to learn the new 2.6 > I

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-14 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Eastep wrote: | On Saturday 12 November 2005 04:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: | |> | |> | What's the "right" way to do this in shorewall? |> |> Never mind...after testing some blacklist rules (and some sleep!), I |> noticed the port specificait

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-14 Thread Tom Eastep
On Saturday 12 November 2005 04:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > | > | What's the "right" way to do this in shorewall? > > Never mind...after testing some blacklist rules (and some sleep!), I > noticed the port specificaitons in the blacklist file are destination > ports, so I can block the above

Re: [leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-12 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Steinkuehler wrote: | I'm migrating to a cable-modem internet connection, and am getting all the | external junk that goes along with the 'shared' nature of this type of link. | | I'd like to drop a bunch of junk that's currently getting logg

[leaf-user] Dropping external cruft by destination IP/port in Shorewall

2005-11-11 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm migrating to a cable-modem internet connection, and am getting all the external junk that goes along with the 'shared' nature of this type of link. I'd like to drop a bunch of junk that's currently getting logged, but am not sure the best way to