Re: [leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and IPSEC509.LRP ?

2003-03-10 Thread Jacques Nilo
On Monday 10 March 2003 22:07, Francois BERGERET wrote: > Hi all folks, > > I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet. > I am using Bering 1.1. > I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files > for Bering 1.1 than the previous 1.0. I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not >

RE: [leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and IPSEC509.LRP ?

2003-03-10 Thread Francois BERGERET
7;origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Lynn Avants > Envoyé : lundi 10 mars 2003 22:36 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and > IPSEC509.LRP ? > > > On Monday 10 March 2003 03:07 pm,

Re: [leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and IPSEC509.LRP ?

2003-03-10 Thread Lynn Avants
On Monday 10 March 2003 03:07 pm, Francois BERGERET wrote: > Hi all folks, > > I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet. > I am using Bering 1.1. > I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files > for Bering 1.1 than the previous 1.0. I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not

[leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and IPSEC509.LRP ?

2003-03-10 Thread Francois BERGERET
Hi all folks, I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet. I am using Bering 1.1. I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files for Bering 1.1 than the previous 1.0. I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not IPSEC509.LRP and not MAWK.LRP in his current directories http://lea