Hello Charles,
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Berdin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Safe transparent proxying via DS
Victor Berdin wrote:
At present I'm scouring the net for info on how to go about with this.
This is really embarassing as I had no idea that having an open proxy
server is a no-no. (http://theproxyconnection.com/openproxy.html)
But it is my requirement to allow EVERYBODY to be able to access
my
Hello Jaime,
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Nebrera Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Berdin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Safe transparent proxying via DS1.02 a
Hello once more,
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Nebrera Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Berdin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Safe transparent proxyi
Hi again,
>> Why do you need the transparent proxy? Do you need a
>> reverse proxy to speed up web access (local cache), do
>> you need load balancing, do you need extra protection?
> Yes, I'm using it as a reverse proxy.
Yes, but why? There are better solution depending of what you wan
Hi,
> I needed to perform transparent proxying wherein
> web clients
> from both public and private net can access my
> internal web
> site.
Why do you need the transparent proxy? Do you need a reverse proxy to speed
up web access (local cache), do you need load balancing, do you need extra
Hi again,
> I notified my ISP soon as I realized that my bandwith is maxed out and
> my private net has nothing to do with it.
This just confirms my previous post.
> What is physically evident is that, during my tests, my external
> device kept
> on blinking like mad. Isuing an 'ifconfig' co
Hello Erich,
- Original Message -
From: "Erich Titl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Berdin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Safe transparent proxying
via DS1.02 and Squid
V
Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>I am puzzled, I always thought spam was distributed using
>mail,e.g.SMTP,
>port 25, how exactly was your server abused?
>Unless your Gateway was completely compromised I do not see how Squid
>was
>used to forward mail.
>
It must not become abused in th
Vic
At 15:02 02.07.2003 +0800, Victor Berdin wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I needed to perform transparent proxying wherein
web clients
from both public and private net can access my
internal web
site.
Transparent proxying AFAIK is nothing but redirection of packets to the
relevant port(s) to a proxy s
Hello Everyone,
I needed to perform transparent proxying wherein
web clients
from both public and private net can access my
internal web
site.
So I rolled a squid.lrp package that came from a
redhat6.2,
and followed the instructions found here:
http://www.flounder.net/ipchains/ipchains-howto.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
