Re: [leaf-user] Trouble with virgin setup of Bering 1.0, on PPPoE DSL

2003-01-27 Thread Brad Fritz
Scott, THANK YOU for being so complete in your setup and problem description. That really eliminates a ton of speculation and guesswork. As you suggested below, you have a default route problem. The default route should be over the PPPoE interface, not eth0. Removing: gateway 172.16.0.254

Re: [leaf-user] Trouble with virgin setup of Bering 1.0, on PPPoE DSL

2003-01-27 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Although PPPoE on Bering is supported and apparently works well you might even consider upgrading your STHome to STPro which does PPPoE for you. here is the link http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php regards Erich At 01:22 27.01.2003 -0500, you wrote: First, thanks to everyone who

Re: [leaf-user] Trouble with virgin setup of Bering 1.0, on PPPoE DSL

2003-01-27 Thread Lynn Avants
On Monday 27 January 2003 02:06 am, Brad Fritz wrote: Scott, THANK YOU for being so complete in your setup and problem description. That really eliminates a ton of speculation and guesswork. As you suggested below, you have a default route problem. The default route should be over the

AW: [leaf-user] Trouble with virgin setup of Bering 1.0, on PPPoE DSL

2003-01-27 Thread Alex Rhomberg
You'll probably have to drop the norfc setting on any interface (eth0) filtered by Shorewall as well, since the 172.16.x.x. address block is reserved. I think that is optional, because I have not monitored any IP traffic between the Modem and the Gateway. In fact, I did not configure IP for

Re: [leaf-user] Trouble with virgin setup of Bering 1.0, on PPPoE DSL

2003-01-27 Thread Julian Church
At 01:22 27/01/03 -0500, freeman wrote: Observations: - I need to have both 'auto ppp0' (et al) and 'auto eth0' (et al) in my interfaces file (/etc/interfaces) because of my 'dual IP' connection from the router to the DSL connection (static 172.16... and PPPoE