Trying to get this in the right order
cpu memhd wrote:
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
---
3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
gatekeeper# busybox --help
BusyBox v1.5.0.svn
cpu memhd wrote:
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
---
3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
gatekeeper# busybox --help
BusyBox v1.5.0.svn (2007-03-20 19:52:54 UTC) multi-call binary
Sounds great, Eric. Thanks! -cpu
--- Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cpu,
The next beta of Bering-uClibc will have use a later version of busybox.
Hopefully all this issues will be solved by then.
Eric
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing
Hi Cpu,
The next beta of Bering-uClibc will have use a later version of busybox.
Hopefully all this issues will be solved by then.
Eric
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
---
3.1
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
---
3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
...when I ping anything in /etc/hosts
I've been using 3.1 for a while but just noticed this:
ping localhost
PING