Trying to get this in the right order
cpu memhd wrote:
> Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
> changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
>
> --->
>
> 3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
gatekeeper# busybox --help
BusyBox v1.5.0.
cpu memhd wrote:
> Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
> changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
>
> --->
>
> 3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
gatekeeper# busybox --help
BusyBox v1.5.0.svn (2007-03-20 19:52:54 UTC) multi-call b
Sounds great, Eric. Thanks! -cpu
--- Eric Spakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Cpu,
>
> The next beta of Bering-uClibc will have use a later version of busybox.
> Hopefully all this issues will be solved by then.
>
>
> Eric
>
> > Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but
Hi Cpu,
The next beta of Bering-uClibc will have use a later version of busybox.
Hopefully all this issues will be solved by then.
Eric
> Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
> changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
>
> --->
>
>
> 3.1
Back in June I posted strange behavior by busybox/ping, but nothing has
changed. I'd like to repost the problem (thoughts, anyone?):
--->
3.1 busybox/ping behaves like ping6...
...when I ping anything in /etc/hosts
I've been using 3.1 for a while but just noticed this:
ping localhost
PING
