[leaf-user] wireless LAN security

2003-07-17 Thread Steve Wright
Hi Folks, What are we using to secure single point-to-point links? - viz WEP, but actually secure.. AIUI, Ad-Hoc mode must be used for backbones, but this leaves security to be done at the IP level - not really good enough. I have read-up on IPSec, but that seems to be about tunneling all the

Re: [leaf-user] wireless LAN security

2003-07-17 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Steve Wright wrote: Hi Folks, What are we using to secure single point-to-point links? - viz WEP, but actually secure.. AIUI, Ad-Hoc mode must be used for backbones, but this leaves security to be done at the IP level - not really good enough. I have read-up on IPSec, but that seems to be abou

Re: [leaf-user] wireless LAN security

2003-07-17 Thread Erich Titl
Steve At 11:24 18.07.2003 +1200, Steve Wright wrote: Hi Folks, What are we using to secure single point-to-point links? - viz WEP, but actually secure.. AIUI, Ad-Hoc mode must be used for backbones, but this leaves security to be done at the IP level - not really good enough. I have read-up o

Re: [leaf-user] wireless LAN security

2003-07-18 Thread Steve Wright
Steve Wright wrote: Hi Folks, etc etc.. replied offlist my mistake. sorry - I'm not used to the list server sending replies offlist.. 8-} any additional comments appreciated. regards, Steve --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware

Re: [leaf-user] wireless LAN security

2003-07-18 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Steve Wright wrote: Charles Steinkuehler wrote: I recently tried setting up something like this between a couple of Dachstein boxes, and I've since fallen back to simply firewalling both ends of the wireless link and treating it like a hostile network. It would be possible with my current setu