RE: [Leaf-user] Still Prob with INTERN_SERVERx (Indexed list) Dachstein

2002-03-07 Thread Boyd Kelly
Hi, I take it back. When starting with INTERN_SERVER1, if I do an ipmasqadm portfw -l -n, then the entries I expect are not there. I suspect that starting at '1' just doesn't load anything at all. Thanks, BK -Original Message- From: Boyd Kelly

Re: [Leaf-user] Still Prob with INTERN_SERVERx (Indexed list) Dachstein

2002-03-07 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> I take it back. > > When starting with INTERN_SERVER1, if I do an ipmasqadm portfw -l -n, then the entries I expect are not there. I suspect that starting at '1' just doesn't load anything at all. This is what I would expect to happen...indexed lists start with zero, and continue to the first

RE: [Leaf-user] Still Prob with INTERN_SERVERx (Indexed list) Dachstein

2002-03-07 Thread Boyd Kelly
Prob with INTERN_SERVERx (Indexed list) Dachstein > I take it back. > > When starting with INTERN_SERVER1, if I do an ipmasqadm portfw -l -n, then the entries I expect are not there. I suspect that starting at '1' ju

Re: [Leaf-user] Still Prob with INTERN_SERVERx (Indexed list) Dachstein

2002-03-07 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> I am probably missing something, but as per below this is what happens if I start at zero. > > The uncommented line (well they all would) from below > gives me an error when starting the network: IP filters: portfw: Invalid > protocol specified. > > I do realize I can use the non indexed section