Re: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates

2005-12-11 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, > Has anyone looked at the Debian ucf package? If not, they should. I > think it could be easily modified to work in a leaf package environment as > an extension to lrcfg. > I took a quick look, but I'm not sure if if can be easely modified (at least not by me :)) It heavely depends on

Re: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Traina
Has anyone looked at the Debian ucf package? If not, they should. I think it could be easily modified to work in a leaf package environment as an extension to lrcfg. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log

RE: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates

2005-12-05 Thread Brad Klinghagen
On Behalf Of groups, freeman Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 10:38 PM To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates I'm of the mindset that this is, for all practical intents and purposes, ill advised and here's my reasoning. The packages

Re: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates

2005-12-04 Thread groups, freeman
I'm of the mindset that this is, for all practical intents and purposes, ill advised and here's my reasoning. The packages are the products of various authors, Tom Eastep for one. Unless he and all contributors were to adhere to some protocol there's the definite potential for problems. Cons