RE: [leaf-user] shorewall and keepalived

2003-01-31 Thread Peter Mueller
> Peter -- is the problem then to get Shorewall to PASS VRRP > packets (as > opposed to the problem statement in the original post)? I assume they are compatible and it should even be easy to configure shorewall to pass the traffic through. I'll be setting up keepalived to authenticate to the o

RE: [leaf-user] shorewall and keepalived

2003-01-31 Thread Tom Eastep
--On Friday, January 31, 2003 5:28 PM -0800 Peter Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the issue of both shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip addresses?

RE: [leaf-user] shorewall and keepalived

2003-01-31 Thread Peter Mueller
Hi Charles, > I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as > keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the > issue of both > shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip > addresses? Just got > this dropped in my lap and not really sure how t

Re: [leaf-user] shorewall and keepalived

2003-01-31 Thread Tom Eastep
--On Friday, January 31, 2003 6:35 PM -0600 Charles Holbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the issue of both shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip address