In message <20091116.134232.819495315@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <200911162003.aa48...@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
>Bummer that the original article was bogus and can't be used to
>predict leap seconds better :(
Ohh, but we can!
Leap seconds is just a political decision that
On Mon 2009-11-16T13:42:32 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
> Hmmm. These papers are interesting reading. They present some of the
> clearest history of parts of this story that I've seen... At least
> the public story...
Regarding the story, it seems this is almost out
http://www.amazon.com/T
In message: <200911162003.aa48...@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
David Malone writes:
: > : http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ136.1909P
: > : http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ136.1906M
:
: > The abstracts look interesting. Is there a way to get copies of the
: > articles without p
> : http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ136.1909P
> : http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ136.1906M
> The abstracts look interesting. Is there a way to get copies of the
> articles without paying $9.00 each for them?
I found copies through the university library - I'd guess most
universi
In message: <20091116183426.gc9...@ucolick.org>
Steve Allen writes:
: On Mon 2009-11-16T10:54:01 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
: > : Perhaps accept it, see for example Deines & Williams 2007, AJ, 134, 64:
: > :
: > : http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1538-3881/134/1/64/205167.text.h
On Mon 2009-11-16T10:54:01 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
> : Perhaps accept it, see for example Deines & Williams 2007, AJ, 134, 64:
> :
> : http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1538-3881/134/1/64/205167.text.html
>
> This paper is very interesting.
Follow the citation trail, it spawned no less th
In message:
Rob Seaman writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
: > In message <20091116072452.ga21...@ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
: >> the context speaks for itself
: >>
: >> http://improbable.com/2009/11/16/leap-second-dating/
: >
: > I can't wait to see what peer-review will
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20091116072452.ga21...@ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>> the context speaks for itself
>>
>> http://improbable.com/2009/11/16/leap-second-dating/
>
> I can't wait to see what peer-review will do to that paper :-)
Perhaps accept it, see for example Dein
In message <20091116072452.ga21...@ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>the context speaks for itself
>
>http://improbable.com/2009/11/16/leap-second-dating/
I can't wait to see what peer-review will do to that paper :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org
