Re: [LEAPSECS] Do good fences make good neighbors?

2011-01-15 Thread Ian Batten
The reason why the 1970-01-01 00:00:00GMT epoch stuck was they made the counter 32 bits to fix the problem once and for all (Source: Dennis Ritchie, at breakfast at USENIX ATC 1998 New Orleans) I've heard roughly the same story from another Murray Hill-ite. What I find surprising about it

Re: [LEAPSECS] Do good fences make good neighbors?

2011-01-15 Thread Ian Batten
quantity), counting in microseconds from 00:00 1-1-1900. Sorry, I mis-remembered: 00:00 1-1-1901. The rationale for that choice of epoch is interesting in itself: http://www.multicians.org/jhs-clock.html ian ___ LEAPSECS mailing list

Re: [LEAPSECS] Do good fences make good neighbors?

2011-01-15 Thread Tom Van Baak
I've heard roughly the same story from another Murray Hill-ite. What I find surprising about it is that most of the people involved in Unics, later Unix, had worked on Multics. Multics, at least by the 1980s when I was using it, represented time as a FIXED BIN(71) (ie a double-word

Re: [LEAPSECS] TAI adjustment ??

2011-01-15 Thread Tom Van Baak
Hal, That same adjustment to TAI nicely shows up in this recent paper: Developing a pulsar-based timescale http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5285 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.5285v1 (PDF) It will be interesting to see how this all plays out over the coming years and decades. Think PDO (Pulsar Disciplined