> comp.protocols.time.ntp contains a list of nearly 50 NTP servers
> with bogus leap indicator today.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.protocols.time.ntp/vh
I actually have per-hour leap bits information for a bunch of servers
going back to before the 2008 leap. It's what
On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:58 PM, David Malone wrote:
> I have 4-year versions of the "fraction of servers advertising
> leapbits" graph here:
>
> http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/time/leap2012/ntp-leapbits.png
>
> It seems from this that there are always a few people advertising
> leap secon
On Sep 1, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Rob Seaman wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:58 PM, David Malone wrote:
>
>> I have 4-year versions of the "fraction of servers advertising
>> leapbits" graph here:
>>
>> http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/time/leap2012/ntp-leapbits.png
>>
>> It seems from this th
On 2012 Sep 1, at 08:07, Warner Losh wrote:
> Does kinda show that it isn't trivial to get this right all the time...
With a notable percentage of the NTP servers always indicating leap
it's another instance of "Don't believe everything the internet says."
This begs for a compare and contrast wit
