On Sat 2014-11-01T16:50:57 -0400, Athena Madeleina hath writ:
> So days may come and go, but UTC with or without leap seconds meets
> its definition just fine - for those who just think of it as a
> universally agreed-upon time reference that's coordinated by timing
> labs. It is not amibuguous i
So days may come and go, but UTC with or without leap seconds meets
its definition just fine - for those who just think of it as a
universally agreed-upon time reference that's coordinated by timing
labs. It is not amibuguous if this universal reference coincides
with UT1 to .9 seconds until 2020
On 30 Oct, 2014, at 12:12 , Richard Clark wrote:
> Well, for historical and archival purposes Julian date nearly always means
> traditional days, as in solar days. But for astronomical uses a fixed
> unit, the apocryphal atomic day is implied. This means needing to know
> delta T if you need to r
