On 2015-02-02 09:17 PM, Steve Allen wrote:
On Wed 2015-01-28T17:05:16 +, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ:
So why don't you simply list all the estimates as we find them ?
As far as I can tell, these guesses/estimates are not inferior to
the ones you already list ?
Listing them all would be
Zefram wrote:
> ...the better way to implement the smear would be to shift it downstream:
> clock synchronisation should be all unadulterated NTP handling the leap
> as a leap, and the lying should happen later, probably where the client
> ntp instances are steering their system clock.
I've been
Martin Burnicki wrote:
>https://www.meinberg.de/download/burnicki/ntp_leap_smearing_test_results.pdf
This is interesting. The smear actually achieved on the downstream ntp
is a complicated function of the smear introduced upstream. Your graphs
nicely illustrate the lesson that Google has
