Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second smearing test results

2016-12-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:37 AM, John Sauter wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 21:50 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> These are the reasons I hate leap seconds: they are of dubious value >> and cause all kinds of havoc because nobody expects them to work, and >> the programming standards are written a

Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second smearing test results

2016-12-23 Thread John Sauter
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 21:50 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > These are the reasons I hate leap seconds: they are of dubious value > and cause all kinds of havoc because nobody expects them to work, and > the programming standards are written as if they don't exist. > > Warner Dubious value: leap se