In message <7c853a0f-1460-4eb0-b8ce-b5ca5c06e...@batten.eu.org>, Ian Batten wri
tes:
>But your recorded date of birth can have quite noticeable effects
>at the one-day level.In England,
>the August 31st/September 1st boundary has marked effects on
>educational outcomes all the way
>through the
On 19 Jan 2014, at 09:58, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <002d01cf14bc$12a03490$37e09db0$@comcast.net>, "Gerard Ashton"
> write
> s:
>
>> The time of birth
>> would be the actual time of birth, but the time zone (and hence date) would
>> be that of the location of the conveyance at the
In message <002d01cf14bc$12a03490$37e09db0$@comcast.net>, "Gerard Ashton" write
s:
>The time of birth
>would be the actual time of birth, but the time zone (and hence date) would
>be that of the location of the conveyance at the time of birth, or the time
>zone where the child is removed from the
Gerard Ashton said:
> A while back a list member asked about how legal rules about time would
> affect the year shown on a person's birth certificate for a person born near
> midnight December 31 / January 1.
[...]
Memory says there was a case in "Uncommon Law" (the 1935 collection of
"Misleading
A while back a list member asked about how legal rules about time would
affect the year shown on a person's birth certificate for a person born near
midnight December 31 / January 1. As a volunteer emergency medical
technician, I have been trained in field childbirth. The EMS state protocol
gives n
