On 1 Jan 2017 at 14:27, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Steve Summit said:
> > But on the wire it was:
> >
> > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:59:60 -0500
>
> That's what mutt showed me (I'm running sendmail on my
> own FreeBSD box).
That's also what Pegasus Mail for Windows shows.
--
== Dan ==
Dan
Since no one has yet mentioned it:
Steve Summit wrote on Sat, 31 Dec 2016
at 19:11:51 -0500 in <2016dec31.1911.scs.0...@eskimo.com>:
> I should have said: readers who are able to view the raw Date:
> line "on the wire". Any mail software which parses and
> redisplays the date (including that wh
Steve Summit said:
> But on the wire it was:
>
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:59:60 -0500
That's what mutt showed me (I'm running sendmail on my
own FreeBSD box).
--
Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: cl...@davros.org | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://w
ubject: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second
...
00078 Sender: "LEAPSECS"
00079
00080 Some readers may be interested in the Date: line on this message.
00081 It is not faked: it was added by a lightly-modified sendmail
00082 program running under a Linux kernel keeping true UTC
I wrote:
> Some readers may be interested in the Date: line on this message.
I should have said: readers who are able to view the raw Date:
line "on the wire". Any mail software which parses and
redisplays the date (including that which archives this mailing
list at pairlist6.pair.net) is likely
Some readers may be interested in the Date: line on this message.
It is not faked: it was added by a lightly-modified sendmail
program running under a Linux kernel keeping true UTC, with the
timestamp fetched via clock_gettime(CLOCK_UTC) and formatted
using a timespec-aware version of localtime().
