Re: [LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012

2015-01-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
Steve Allen writes: > On Sat 2015-01-10T22:53:14 -0800, Ask Bj=F8rn Hansen hath writ: > > What's better about NTP and the NTP Pool since 2012? > > This is a question better answered by David Malone based on his > long-term monitoring of the leap flags in the NTP pool, but ... > > At the end of 20

Re: [LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012

2015-01-11 Thread Tony Finch
There were false leap second events six months ago. I didn't hear of any coinciding with the new year. See the brief thread starting at https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/leapsecs/2014-July/005130.html Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at > On 11 Jan 2015, at 21:17, Steve Allen wr

Re: [LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012

2015-01-11 Thread Martin Burnicki
Folks, originally I wrote this email about 9 hours ago, but sent it using a different email address which is not subscribed to the list. So apparingly the first email was blocked, and I'm sending it once more. Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: Steve Allen wrote: [...] NTP and the NTP pool are more r

Re: [LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012

2015-01-11 Thread Steve Allen
On Sat 2015-01-10T22:53:14 -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen hath writ: > What's better about NTP and the NTP Pool since 2012? This is a question better answered by David Malone based on his long-term monitoring of the leap flags in the NTP pool, but ... At the end of 2012 July there were false leap second

[LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012

2015-01-10 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
> Steve Allen wrote: [...] > NTP and the NTP pool are more robust too, so that will be better. What's better about NTP and the NTP Pool since 2012? I try not to mean that as a retorical question; I'm interested -- it would be good news. I don't know what's better about them and in the case of