On 3 Sep 2010, at 02:28, Tony Finch wrote:
On 2 Sep 2010, at 22:03, Ian Batten wrote:
De facto UK time is UTC; de jure is UT, probably UT1.
De jure it is "Greenwich mean time". AIUI when GMT was last
maintained as a solar timescale it did not correspond exactly to
modern UT1 nor UT2, t
On Thu 2010-09-02T20:21:41 -0600, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
> And the on-time marks for the signals are UTC, with a resolution of
> microseconds. The resolution of the DUT1 data is only 100ms. This
> sounds to me like the official time is UTC, and that, oh, by the way,
> there's this extra parame
In message: <589ce97f-1e07-40e2-8288-67ea9cfcf...@dotat.at>
Tony Finch writes:
: On 2 Sep 2010, at 22:03, Ian Batten wrote:
: >
: > De facto UK time is UTC; de jure is UT, probably UT1.
:
: De jure it is "Greenwich mean time". AIUI when GMT was last maintained as a
solar timescale
On 2 Sep 2010, at 22:03, Ian Batten wrote:
>
> De facto UK time is UTC; de jure is UT, probably UT1.
De jure it is "Greenwich mean time". AIUI when GMT was last maintained as a
solar timescale it did not correspond exactly to modern UT1 nor UT2, though it
was similar.
How does UTC+DUT1 relate
In message <25804530-dbba-4aad-b6d9-441b59dcf...@noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>When telescopes are outlawed, only outlaws will have telescopes.
Totally off-topic, but to good to not share:
When marriage is outlawed, only outlaws will have inlaws.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
On 2 Sep 2010, at 21:04, Finkleman, Dave wrote:
I believe that no one is advocating UT1 for civil time scales.
De facto UK time is UTC; de jure is UT, probably UT1.
I have discovered that UTC is the statutory time scale for the United
States but without qualification. In other words, if
On 2010-09-02, at 22:04, Finkleman, Dave wrote:
> Conversely, it UTC were changed but given a different name,
This is very confusing. Wasn't the whole point of having a new name that the
meaning of "UTC" didn't have to change?
N
___
LEAPSECS mailing
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> "Finkleman, Dave" writes:
>
>> In other words, if UTC changes and is still called UTC, the new definition
>> would be the statutory requirement. Every process and system developed for
>> the previous definition would be illegal.
>
> Unless of course, if the nature o
In message <3b33e89c51d2de44be2f0c757c656c8809437...@mail02.stk.com>, "Finklema
n, Dave" writes:
>In other words, if UTC changes and is
>still called UTC, the new definition would be the statutory requirement.
>Every process and system developed for the previous definition would be
>illegal.
Unle
I believe that no one is advocating UT1 for civil time scales.
I have discovered that UTC is the statutory time scale for the United
States but without qualification. In other words, if UTC changes and is
still called UTC, the new definition would be the statutory requirement.
Every process and
10 matches
Mail list logo
