Re: [LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 48, Issue 12

2010-12-15 Thread Finkleman, Dave
Many of your comments are addressed in AIAA-2010-8391, which Ken, John, and I wrote for the Toronto AAS conference last August. It is available online, or interested parties can write me personally, and I will provide copies. AGI did not relinquish complete copy rights to AIAA or AAS. ISO 8601 i

Re: [LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 48, Issue 12

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Deckers
On 2010-12-15 17:47, Finkleman, Dave wrote: ISO 8601 is a problem. So far I have not heard anything from ISO TC12, which is responsible. But I am diligent. I will extract something from them. Their treatment of time is "deficient" and inconsistent. I don't know how this was coordina

Re: [LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 48, Issue 12

2010-12-15 Thread Ian Batten
> > ISO is not a governmental organization. It does not enforce and it > cannot mandate any of its standards. No, but it exerts an almost magnetic effect on public sector organisations in the UK and what one might loosely refer to as German-influenced countries (Holland, Germany, Scandinavia,

Re: [LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 48, Issue 12

2010-12-16 Thread Joe Gwinn
At 7:14 AM + 12/16/10, Ian Batten wrote: > ISO is not a governmental organization. It does not enforce and it cannot mandate any of its standards. No, but it exerts an almost magnetic effect on public sector organisations in the UK and what one might loosely refer to as German-influe