On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta writes:
>
> >Parting Shot (quoted from the Paper):
> >The ideal next-generation Fuzzball would be programmed in C, support the
> >Unix run-time environment, TCP/IP and ISO protocol suites and contain no
> >licensed code.
>
We owe much to the pioneering work described in the article, and
particularly to David Mills' contributions to computer timekeeping.
On 2017-01-09 09:57 PM, Brooks Harris wrote:
The Fuzzball
https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/papers/fuzz.pdf
Ah. PDP 11 running RT11 (the RT stands for r
In message
, Sanjeev Gupta writes:
>Parting Shot (quoted from the Paper):
>The ideal next-generation Fuzzball would be programmed in C, support the
>Unix run-time environment, TCP/IP and ISO protocol suites and contain no
>licensed code.
Yeah, it's called "FreeBSD" :-)
--
Poul-Henning
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Brooks Harris wrote:
> Ah. PDP 11 running RT11 (the RT stands for real-time, you know, and it
> was!). Bigger and much heavier than a breadbox it had a lot of power. Oh,
> wait, I mean it *used* a lot of power. And you could modify it with a
> soldering iron and
The Fuzzball
https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/papers/fuzz.pdf
Ah. PDP 11 running RT11 (the RT stands for real-time, you know, and it
was!). Bigger and much heavier than a breadbox it had a lot of power.
Oh, wait, I mean it *used* a lot of power. And you could modify it with
a solderi
