On 15/09/2016 22:50, Alberto Bursi wrote:
> I said that for that it's better a "talk/discussion" page on a wiki,
> because a forum needs more time investment than a wiki to be done right
> and should be treated as its own project with its own volunteers and so
> on, not as an appendage of the
On 15/09/2016 22:41, Alberto Bursi wrote:
> Note that I'm not talking about the wiki. That was not a major issue as
> being a separate thing it can be set up unofficially, or whatever.
> I am just arguing about principles here, as I'm spotting a possibly bad
> pattern where the same bad practic
On 09/15/2016 07:21 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 15/09/2016 00:10, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>> I think we should avoid forums for now and should lay out the wiki's
>> plans in a wiki page and activate a plugin (there are at least a couple
>> for docuwiki) to make a "talk" page or "discussion" page
On 09/15/2016 07:20 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 15/09/2016 01:11, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>>
>> On 09/14/2016 12:27 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>> Hi Alberto,
>>>
>>> don't hold back yourself waiting for a response from "the LEDE devs" -
>>> those who care about a wiki will likely endorse whateve
On 2016-09-15 19:32, Tim Harvey wrote:
> commit dc17fde99436fd7912914c0e4d3f106820ffe9e8 renamed the USB gadget
> modules but missed a dependency causing a build regression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
Already taken care of in fa05f1d41b
- Felix
__
On 2016-09-15 20:27, Tim Harvey wrote:
> Felix,
>
> I like the 'idea' of using mtdsplit (very clean) however this break's
> the ability to downgrade firmware. If I take an old firmware image (a
> version of OpenWrt prior to cns3xxx moving to the 4.4 kernel which
> became too large to fit in the ha
Hi John,
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 09:40 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 17/08/2016 16:53, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 16:51 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 17/08/2016 16:49, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > >
> von Alberto Bursi
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2016 00:44
> I think techinfodepot is going to be more cooperative with this plan
> than wikidevi, although wikidevi is already queryable somehwhat so
> extracting data would work.
>From a PM:
"I believe that DarkShadow the creator of TechI
On 15/09/2016 20:52, Thomas Endt wrote:
>> von John Crispin
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2016 07:20
>
>> if you need a strong leader to tell you what you can(not) do,
>> then you are in the wrong place buddy.
>
> I think the reason for asking the devs about their approval or at least
> von John Crispin
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2016 07:20
> if you need a strong leader to tell you what you can(not) do,
> then you are in the wrong place buddy.
I think the reason for asking the devs about their approval or at least
their opinion was just respect. In the absence of an
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-09-15 12:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-15 11:34, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
As indicated by Tim Harvey:
The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1
> I think we should avoid forums for now and should lay out the wiki's
> plans in a wiki page and activate a plugin (there are at least a couple
> for docuwiki) to make a "talk" page or "discussion" page like
> Wikipedia's for wiki volunteer interactions.
Interesting idea.
The "discussion" page is
commit dc17fde99436fd7912914c0e4d3f106820ffe9e8 renamed the USB gadget
modules but missed a dependency causing a build regression.
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/us
* Jo-Philipp Wich [15.09.2016 16:58]:
> can you check whether it is maybe caused by
>
> http://git.lede-project.org/5c9cc7b7f8920944a413644e1c2ea23bfe655bcb ?
vm.min_free_kbytes
really interesting, i have just overlooked this commit.
for the record: with OpenWrt r49276 this value is 668
for a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can you check whether it is maybe caused by
>
> http://git.lede-project.org/5c9cc7b7f8920944a413644e1c2ea23bfe655bcb ?
>
>
> Its just a hunch.
Could be part of the problem, it looks like memory reserved by
vm.min_free_kbytes ca
Hi,
can you check whether it is maybe caused by
http://git.lede-project.org/5c9cc7b7f8920944a413644e1c2ea23bfe655bcb ?
Its just a hunch.
~ Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-d
Add the following gadget driver modules:
- kmod-usb-gadget-ncm (g_ncm)
- kmod-usb-gadget-hid (g_hid)
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk | 39 +
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-09-15 12:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-09-15 11:34, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
>>> As indicated by Tim Harvey:
>>>
>>> The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1.5MB limit
>>> imposed by the SPI flash MTD partition mappi
That's why I am an adept of hierarchy or at least have well defined
who is responsible for what, otherwise when something is sent to all
nobody will care much to respond unless that affects him/her directly
in some way.
I'm not talking about someone giving orders and others following it,
but just h
Hi,
I'm not sure if that's a bug or inevitable so I'd thought I'd ask here
about the position from the LEDE devs/community.
At the moment 32MB devices are pretty much unusable with LEDE and I'm
not sure why.
A 1043NDv1 on CC 15.05 has 15MB free memory:
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:
On 2016-09-15 12:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-09-15 11:34, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
>> As indicated by Tim Harvey:
>>
>> The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1.5MB limit
>> imposed by the SPI flash MTD partition mapping. Increase this
>> to 2MB where it is for NOR flash devices
On 2016-09-15 11:34, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
> As indicated by Tim Harvey:
>
> The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1.5MB limit
> imposed by the SPI flash MTD partition mapping. Increase this
> to 2MB where it is for NOR flash devices.
> Additionally add a check that ensures the ker
On 15/09/2016 11:34, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
> As indicated by Tim Harvey:
>
> The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1.5MB limit
> imposed by the SPI flash MTD partition mapping. Increase this
> to 2MB where it is for NOR flash devices.
> Additionally add a check that ensures the k
As indicated by Tim Harvey:
The 4.4 kernel is not easily sized down to below the 1.5MB limit
imposed by the SPI flash MTD partition mapping. Increase this
to 2MB where it is for NOR flash devices.
Additionally add a check that ensures the kernel fits within
the 2MB limit.
This resolves boot issue
On 14 September 2016 at 21:46, Alexandru Ardelean
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> recently a whole bunch of posts went around on network world,
>> slashdot, and elsewhere, about how to go about disabling or dimming
>> the leds.
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/artic
25 matches
Mail list logo
