Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:07:01 +0100 Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Ralph Sennhauser [2016-11-06 10:59:43 > +0100]: > > The conflict between Musls net/if.h and linux/if.h is an old well > > known one and taken care of by a series of linux-headers patches in >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

Hi Jo On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 20:48:58 +0100 Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi again, > > > Will see if I find another solution... > > I managed to find a solution that works for me on a Linux 4.6.0 system > with glibc, a Linux 4.6.0 system with unpatched musl and a Linux 4.4 > system

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

On 7 November 2016 at 02:18, Alberto Bursi wrote: > On 11/06/2016 09:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> So far I was always using my notebook for the development. My >> requirements were Intel i7 quad core + AMD GPU. I was using some >> Samsung but it's GPU has died and I

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

On 7 November 2016 at 00:40, Russell Senior wrote: > I have a 16-core build box which I connect to over ssh. I use scp to > move images to devices. I have a testbed with ethernet connections to > the build box and serial consoles on most if not all of them. But what

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

On 11/06/2016 09:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Hey, > > So far I was always using my notebook for the development. My > requirements were Intel i7 quad core + AMD GPU. I was using some > Samsung but it's GPU has died and I can't replace it (stupid > 216-0811000 chipset). > > I'm looking for a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

I compile on a NUC 6i5, works relatively well. My main machine is a macbook pro i7 though (and even though the specs match, none of them are particularly Linux friendly) > On 7 Nov 2016, at 00:40, Russell Senior wrote: > >> "Rafał" == Rafał Miłecki

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

> "Rafał" == Rafał Miłecki writes: Rafał> Hey, So far I was always using my notebook for the Rafał> development. My requirements were Intel i7 quad core + AMD GPU. I Rafał> was using some Samsung but it's GPU has died and I can't replace Rafał> it (stupid 216-0811000

Re: [LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 21:24 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Hey, > > So far I was always using my notebook for the development. My > requirements were Intel i7 quad core + AMD GPU. I was using some > Samsung but it's GPU has died and I can't replace it (stupid > 216-0811000 chipset). > > I'm

[LEDE-DEV] How do you develop (compile) LEDE efficiently?

Hey, So far I was always using my notebook for the development. My requirements were Intel i7 quad core + AMD GPU. I was using some Samsung but it's GPU has died and I can't replace it (stupid 216-0811000 chipset). I'm looking for a new notebook, but I can't find anything with i7 quad core + AMD

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

Hi again, > Will see if I find another solution... I managed to find a solution that works for me on a Linux 4.6.0 system with glibc, a Linux 4.6.0 system with unpatched musl and a Linux 4.4 system with patched kernel headers. I pushed this change along with a few others that should aid in

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC] ADSL Modem Allnet All0333CJ Rev.C / Amazon-SE SoC

* Tino Reichardt wrote: > * Mathias Kresin wrote: > > 2016-11-04 9:46 GMT+01:00 Tino Reichardt : > > > * Alberto Bursi wrote: > > >> On 11/03/2016 10:13 AM, Tino Reichardt wrote: > > >> > Most of these Modems

Re: [LEDE-DEV] regulatory domain information

on 2016-10-24 Charles wrote: > on 2016-10-24 Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > On 2016-10-19 23:31, Charles wrote: > > > > > > Questions: > > > > > > 1. Why does LEDE show four regulatory domain blocks while OpenWrt shows > > >only one? > > This was added in Linux upstream. LEDE uses a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

* Ralph Sennhauser [2016-11-06 10:59:43 +0100]: > The conflict between Musls net/if.h and linux/if.h is an old well known > one and taken care of by a series of linux-headers patches in OpenWrt. > Since Linux 4.8-rc5 Firewall3 also indirectly pulls in linux/in.h and >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

Hi Ralph, unfortunately this breaks building on a glibc system for me: -- 8< -- $ make [ 7%] Building C object CMakeFiles/firewall3.dir/iptables.c.o In file included from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:8:0, from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:21,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TDW8970 Slow Wireless Performance when using VDSL2

2016-11-06 11:47 GMT+01:00, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant : > > > On 06/11/16 10:12, Xander Shelley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've installed LEDE Nov5 snapshot onto my TP-Link TD-W8970 router to use >> with a UK fibre ISP (Plus.net) >> >> Out of the box most things work

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Flashing AP148 ubi file?

On 11/05/2016 11:55 PM, Christian Mehlis wrote: > Hi, > > I received a Compex WPQ864, which is almost a AP148 board. > > Can someone document how to flash a dot ubi file (generated from lede > build) to an AP148 (ipq8064)? > > I'm optimistic that this will work for the WPQ, too. > > I hope to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TDW8970 Slow Wireless Performance when using VDSL2

On 06/11/16 10:12, Xander Shelley wrote: Hi there, I've installed LEDE Nov5 snapshot onto my TP-Link TD-W8970 router to use with a UK fibre ISP (Plus.net) Out of the box most things work great. If I connect via Ethernet to the router from my xubuntu T410 laptop, and run a speed test using

[LEDE-DEV] TDW8970 Slow Wireless Performance when using VDSL2

Hi there, I've installed LEDE Nov5 snapshot onto my TP-Link TD-W8970 router to use with a UK fibre ISP (Plus.net) Out of the box most things work great. If I connect via Ethernet to the router from my xubuntu T410 laptop, and run a speed test using (speedtest.net) I get close to line speed

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH RFC firewall3] musl-compat: avoid kernel header conflicts

The conflict between Musls net/if.h and linux/if.h is an old well known one and taken care of by a series of linux-headers patches in OpenWrt. Since Linux 4.8-rc5 Firewall3 also indirectly pulls in linux/in.h and linux/in6.h leading to new conflicts. As Firewall3 is fine with just the libc

Re: [LEDE-DEV] jtag on rt5350

Thanks to a resistance I had the jtag working properly. Thanks to the jtag I have now the uboot from the ralink-sdk working properly in ram (after skipping the init phase). Now I would like to flash it. I see that the flash image add an header on the top of the uboot image where are stored also

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH firewall3] iptables: optional loading of static extensions

Make loading of static extensions optional to support vanilla iptables in it's default configuration by setting DISABLE_STATIC_EXTENSIONS instead of hackery. In case iptables is built with --disable-static libext.a, libext4.a and libext6.a which OpenWrt installs in the form of libiptext.so,