On 27-12-16 12:57, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> While the standard does not require SHA256-based algorithms when PFM is
> mandatory, there's not much of a point in keeping the old algorithms
> enabled.
>
> See http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2014-November/031283.html
Please ignore this patch, I am
This patch defines the reset button in the MIWIFI-NANO.dts
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney
---
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/MIWIFI-NANO.dts
b/target/linux/ramips/dts/MIWIFI-NANO.dts
index 6906ef3..9b1ca42 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/MIWIFI-NANO.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/MIW
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently procd service restart/reload can be triggered by config
> changes and network interface changes. from what i understand you are
> missing the following features
>
> * an option to simply run a script to check if the service s
On 12/27/2016 02:13 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am 27.12.2016 um 21:15 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>>
>> On 12/27/2016 12:07 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>>> In general that's right, but disabling all postinst(-pkg) and prerm(-pkg)
>>> is more than awful.
>>> If base-files not selected yo
Am 27.12.2016 um 21:15 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>
> On 12/27/2016 12:07 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> In general that's right, but disabling all postinst(-pkg) and prerm(-pkg) is
>> more than awful.
>> If base-files not selected you should nevertheless call postinst-/prerm-pkg.
>
> To wha
On 12/27/2016 09:13 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> make build without problems. Thanks.
>
> If ext4 is a buildin of the Kernel then it should be removed from kmod
> because it cannot be deselected and select make no sense. Same to vfat (if
> buildin).
>
Even better, it should show as alrea
(please stop top-posting).
On 12/27/2016 12:07 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> In general that's right, but disabling all postinst(-pkg) and prerm(-pkg) is
> more than awful.
> If base-files not selected you should nevertheless call postinst-/prerm-pkg.
To what purpose is that helpful? base-f
make build without problems. Thanks.
If ext4 is a buildin of the Kernel then it should be removed from kmod because
it cannot be deselected and select make no sense. Same to vfat (if buildin).
Am 26.12.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Felix Fietkau:
> Should be fixed in the latest version, please test.
>
In general that's right, but disabling all postinst(-pkg) and prerm(-pkg) is
more than awful.
If base-files not selected you should nevertheless call postinst-/prerm-pkg.
Otherwise their is no real chance to work without base-files whatever you do in
package Makefile.
Am 27.12.2016 um 21:00 schr
On 12/27/2016 11:32 AM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Do you really think this is a good idea ?
> If base-files package is not selected, the postinst-pkg and prerm-pkg of none
> of the other selected packages will be called.
> It's nice to suppress error messages but to switch off all postinst an
Also keep in mind my pull https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/618
Am 26.12.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> Le 12/09/16 à 16:04, Florian Fainelli a écrit :
>> If the base-files package is not selected, we will fail executing the
>> very first postinst script:
>>
>> make[3]: Leavin
Do you really think this is a good idea ?
If base-files package is not selected, the postinst-pkg and prerm-pkg of none
of the other selected packages will be called.
It's nice to suppress error messages but to switch off all postinst and prerm
defined inside Makefile of any selected package in n
I want to build mt7615 driver to be used in mt7621 based target board
for 4.4 kernel
where can i get the mt7615 source code?
Thanks
Mani
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
I'm trying to add support for a ZyXEL NSA310 (kirkwood-based NAS), but
the kernel does not find the rootfs in the ubi.
The image has kernel+rootfs(squashfs)+rootfs_data(ubifs?) in ubi, built with
FILESYSTEMS := squashfs
IMAGES += factory.bin
IMAGE/factory.bin := append-ubi
KERNEL_IN_UBI := 1
If
On 25.12.2016 16:17, Magnus Kroken wrote:
Hi Martin
On 25.12.2016 14.23, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
I guess this worked on LEDE with PolarSSL with OpenVPN 2.3:
#define POLARSSL_KEY_EXCHANGE_DHE_RSA_ENABLED
while
//#define MBEDTLS_KEY_EXCHANGE_DHE_RSA_ENABLED
can you tell if I ran into some cor
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:50 AM, James Feeney wrote:
>
> OpenLEDE
I do agree that a more distinct name change than "lede" is needed for
the added googlejuice. To me though the openthis, openthat,
libretheotherthing meme has got kind of old in recent years, although
it does seem to end up hinting
OpenLEDE
The name both combines the project names and conveys that sense of greater
transparency that was, in part, the purpose of the LEDE project.
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 08:28:25AM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> On 27/12/2016 08:08, David Lang wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> >>> i am still very much in favour of having 2 trees, one stable and one dev
> >>> tree. t
so if I were to get crazy again today and install lede I would end up
with a gui?
:)
@ Outback Dingo
https://lede-project.org/docs/guide-quick-start/start
Nothing in there talks about enabling a feed..
Doing a simple dnscrypt-proxy and the sqm scripts..
Trying to fight the bufferbloat fight..
Hi,
There was a problem with opkg:
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=commit;h=dc5f496a0df8d125ce172fc40100098b18da2300
Should be fixed now. Just a (rather transient ;-) ) patch of bad luck.
Cheers
Stijn
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:57 AM, B. Cook wrote:
> I was ddwrt 24 hours ago.. was convinced to try openwrt; Simply amazed how
> much fast the same router was.
>
> Shot myself in the foot by being greedy and wanting to try lede..
>
> root@lede:~# uname -a
> Linux lede 4.4.39 #0 Sat Dec 24 13:55:45 2
So I can;t find the exact mail I was going to reply to a few days ago
(WH does the android gmail client force send html...) so I'm
nuking all context. Sorry.
I have been quite happy with the LEDE name change.
I'm been a OpenWRT user since before WR. I will be the first to agree
that the na
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:01 PM, H
I was ddwrt 24 hours ago.. was convinced to try openwrt; Simply amazed how
much fast the same router was.
Shot myself in the foot by being greedy and wanting to try lede..
root@lede:~# uname -a
Linux lede 4.4.39 #0 Sat Dec 24 13:55:45 2016 mips GNU/Linux
root@lede:~# df -h
Filesystem
On 12/25/2016 07:12 PM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi John, Hi Hauke,
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:08 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/12/2016 00:21, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> This was introduced in kernel 4.4, but broken there and fixed in 4.5.
>>> I would like to activate it, but I am
Rework wpa_key_mgmt handling for wpa_supplicant to be consistent with
how it is done for hostapd.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
package/network/services/hostapd/files/netifd.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/network/services/hostap
Enable support for stronger SHA256-based algorithms in hostapd and
wpa_supplicant when using WPA-EAP or WPA-PSK with 802.11w enabled.
We cannot unconditionally enable it, as it requires hostapd to be
compiled with 802.11w support, which is disabled in the -mini variants.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tint
While the standard does not require SHA256-based algorithms when PFM is
mandatory, there's not much of a point in keeping the old algorithms
enabled.
See http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2014-November/031283.html
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
package/network/services/hostapd/files/neti
On 27/12/2016 01:07, Martin Tippmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 12/26/2016 08:05 AM, Martin Tippmann wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Denys Vlasenko
>>> So TL;DR: procd is fine for init but having runit/runsvdir easily
>>> usable would be a nice
29 matches
Mail list logo
