Based on kernel activity, this driver is not under active development.
And yes, avoid.
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 00:42 +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I can tell, the b43 driver does not support AC chipsets
> like
> BCM4352, BCM4360, BCM4366. Support for these is marked BROKEN
>
Hi,
As far as I can tell, the b43 driver does not support AC chipsets like
BCM4352, BCM4360, BCM4366. Support for these is marked BROKEN upstream.
This means that a few devices supported by LEDE actually have no wireless,
for instance Archer C9 v1, ASUS RT-AC68U, maybe others. Also, quite a lot
The support for alternatives in LEDE was introduced recently [1] to
address the issue where multiple packages attempt to install the same
symlink. The method for alternatives support in LEDE is different from
that of Debian. In LEDE, an alternative is an attribute of package’s
CONTROL file: [1].
T
> I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found
> here [1].
>
> the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
> backports/pending/hacks.
>
> I'd like to push this asap if there are no mayor issues as it will be
> a pain to rebase once again
>
> Joh
> Look for the word 0x7620 at an even offset, that's the start of the
EEPROM.
>
> > Here the complete bootlog:
> > ...
>
> You are on the right spot, the log confirms that the eeprom partition or
offset
> is certainly wrong.
Daniel, thanks for your help.
Now I'm able to complete the boot.
But I
On 31-07-17 18:11, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found
> here [1].
>
> the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
> backports/pending/hacks.
I would prefer to keep the patches-X.Y directory and use backport, hack
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:11:49PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found here [1].
>
> the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
> backports/pending/hacks.
>
> I'd like to push this asap if there are no mayor issue
Hi,
I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found here [1].
the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
backports/pending/hacks.
I'd like to push this asap if there are no mayor issues as it will be a
pain to rebase once again
John
[1]
htt
Okay!
Sorry for mistake.
On 07/31/2017 03:05 PM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
On 31-07-17 13:20, Yury Shvedov wrote:
From: Vadim Balakhanov
This patch implements channel list support in UCI. This functionality
already supported in hostapd.
NAK. This is already supported by the 'channels' option.
On 31-07-17 13:20, Yury Shvedov wrote:
> From: Vadim Balakhanov
>
> This patch implements channel list support in UCI. This functionality
> already supported in hostapd.
>
NAK. This is already supported by the 'channels' option.
Stijn
___
Lede-dev mail
From: Vadim Balakhanov
This patch implements channel list support in UCI. This functionality
already supported in hostapd.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Balakhanov
---
package/network/services/hostapd/files/hostapd.sh | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/networ
On 21 July 2017 at 19:36, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 03:01 AM, Catrinel Catrinescu wrote:
>> Hi Dirk
>>
>> Fell free to take my patch and extend it with your wish :-)
>
> Usually if someone gives you feedback and your patch is not applied
> (which is the case AFAICT)0), it is kind of
12 matches
Mail list logo
