The target name does not need to included a revision
if all revisions are supported.
This target supports all revisions (v1, v2, v2.1).
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
target/linux/brcm47xx/image/Makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
Replace 'north-america' by 'us' and remove 'other-regions' in image files for
Netgear WGR614 v10.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
target/linux/brcm47xx/image/Makefile | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Jo and others:
Is there an easy way to extend firewall rules? I’d like to add support to
blocking on a per-country basis, possibly with qualified exceptions.
For instance, if I wanted to block all ISP’s from RU, but allow email from
Kaspersky’s servers in Russia.
I’d like to do something
Recent RouterBOOT version (at least version 3.41 on RB911G-5HPacD)
use "Board=" kernel parameter instead of "board=" to pass the board
name to the kernel. Due to this change the board detection code is
not working on the devices shipped with the new RouterBOOT version.
Because the kernel is unable
08.12.2017 21:14, Daniel Golle:
Hi Mathias,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:35:26AM +0100, Mathias Kresin wrote:
udhcpc doesn't send a hostname by default. Use the system hostname if
nothing else is specified, to always send a hostname.
It syncs the behaviour to odhcpc, which always sends a
Hi Mathias,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:35:26AM +0100, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> udhcpc doesn't send a hostname by default. Use the system hostname if
> nothing else is specified, to always send a hostname.
>
> It syncs the behaviour to odhcpc, which always sends a hostname.
Could we somehow allow
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2017-12-07 15:55, Felix Fietkau wrote:
Hi,
Are there any remaining concerns about those 'OpenWrt merge' patches
that have been sitting in my staging tree for a while now?
If not, I plan on pushing them to master this weekend.
Done.
- Felix
On 2017-12-07 15:55, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any remaining concerns about those 'OpenWrt merge' patches
> that have been sitting in my staging tree for a while now?
>
> If not, I plan on pushing them to master this weekend.
Done.
- Felix
On 2017-12-08 04:37, Rosen Penev wrote:
Should help slightly.
Hi, Rosen, did you actually see any measurable improvements when
applying these?
I was playing with these QCA changes back in 4.1 times and didn't see
any improvement.
When there are several patches it would be better to
Your build is based on an old .config that enables "odhcpd" (as it was the
default in the past). The latest master includes a package
"odhcpd-ipv6only", which is the default since
c7b052db739e50f8a40f95ac17a21363b1593e33.
Our Kconfig-based .config management can't properly deal with conficting
Citeren Mauro Mozzarelli :
Hello,
I am trying to compile trunk just pulled today and this is how it fails:
[...]
Configuring libpopt.
Configuring getopt.
Configuring gzip.
Configuring atm-tools.
Configuring kmod-ltq-deu-vr9.
Configuring kmod-fs-cifs.
Configuring
Hello,
I am trying to compile trunk just pulled today and this is how it fails:
[...]
Configuring libpopt.
Configuring getopt.
Configuring gzip.
Configuring atm-tools.
Configuring kmod-ltq-deu-vr9.
Configuring kmod-fs-cifs.
Configuring kmod-usb-storage-extras.
Configuring xz-utils.
The `is_error()` is just a macro that checks
that object is NULL (which is considered an error
in libjson-c terminology).
Newer libjson-c versions have deprecated this.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean
---
handler.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Alexandru Ardelean
wrote:
> The `is_error()` is just a macro that checks
> that object is NULL (which is considered an error
> in libjson-c terminology).
>
> Newer libjson-c versions have deprecated this.
I forgot to add the [netifd] tag.
The `is_error()` is just a macro that checks
that object is NULL (which is considered an error
in libjson-c terminology).
Newer libjson-c versions have deprecated this.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean
---
handler.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Pierre Pfister
IETF is moving toward implementing IPv6 multihoming by sending
multiple RAs on a single interface:
- draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-00
- draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-02
odhcpd supports configuration of multiple software interfaces
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:33 AM, wrote:
> From: Pierre Pfister
>
> IETF is moving toward implementing IPv6 multihoming by sending
> multiple RAs on a single interface:
> - draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-00
> -
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> On 08-12-17 09:35, Mathias Kresin wrote:
>> udhcpc doesn't send a hostname by default. Use the system hostname if
>> nothing else is specified, to always send a hostname.
>>
>> It syncs the behaviour to odhcpc, which
On 08-12-17 09:35, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> udhcpc doesn't send a hostname by default. Use the system hostname if
> nothing else is specified, to always send a hostname.
>
> It syncs the behaviour to odhcpc, which always sends a hostname.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
> ---
>
On 2017-12-08 03:37, Rosen Penev wrote:
> This patch is preparation for ag71xx usage of external, on-die
> resources. Since these resources are limited, we need to track how
> many instances we have probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Menchaca
> Signed-off-by: Rosen
On 2017-12-08 03:37, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Moves the code more in line with QCA code. Also reduces variable to a u16
> instead of s32.
>
> QCA code has the roundup component behind a Makefile config. Not sure if
> enabled by default so I opted to keep current behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen
On 2017-12-08 03:37, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Less verbose code. Should help when porting some of the other patches.
NACK. I don't think it makes things simpler in any meaningful way.
- Felix
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
May I make a late contribution to this thread?
As a user and occasional contributor to openwrt and lede I'd like to stress
how invaluable the openwrt wiki in its current form is, precisely because
it is real hotchpotch. Of course it is unstructured, of course there is
redundancy, of course some
From: Pierre Pfister
IETF is moving toward implementing IPv6 multihoming by sending
multiple RAs on a single interface:
- draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-00
- draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-02
odhcpd supports configuration of multiple software interfaces
udhcpc doesn't send a hostname by default. Use the system hostname if
nothing else is specified, to always send a hostname.
It syncs the behaviour to odhcpc, which always sends a hostname.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
25 matches
Mail list logo