Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

2017-02-08 Thread John Crispin
On 08/02/2017 16:22, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi John, > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 16:20 +0100, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> superseded by a procd update in my staging tree. > > Ok I just wanted to make sure we may build reliably everything from > the very scratch (i.e. after "make

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

2017-02-08 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hi John, On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 16:20 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > superseded by a procd update in my staging tree. Ok I just wanted to make sure we may build reliably everything from the very scratch (i.e. after "make distclean") for 2017.01 release. -Alexey

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

2017-02-08 Thread John Crispin
Hi, superseded by a procd update in my staging tree. John On 08/02/2017 14:34, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > sha256sum for both > http://sources.lede-project.org/ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz > and locally created archive from git doesn't match expected >

[LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

2017-02-08 Thread Alexey Brodkin
sha256sum for both http://sources.lede-project.org/ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz and locally created archive from git doesn't match expected ae77504a4397f92173a7646fa3555e5b51abd7ff1dd1c419770223359e41937a So we update checksum. Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin Cc: John