Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 24/05/17 10:13, Paul Oranje wrote: Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ? Paul people with voting rights and probably also regular contributors ... that is however unrelated to the remerge discussion and would fall under the normal voting system Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ? Paul > Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11 heeft Imre Kaloz het volgende > geschreven: > > Hi, > > On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 23/05/17 17:29, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi John, John Crispin wrote: here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. [snip] Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or if you want to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Hi John, John Crispin wrote: here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. [snip] Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or if you want to wait a few days if anything bumps in for a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Hi, On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote: On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 05/22/2017 02:02 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> *) branding >> - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand >> - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most >> people said they did not care >> - as the last vote had a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:39, Vincenzo Romano wrote: I also agree to everything. With am extra point. 2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper : *) SPI - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone else is interested let us know) - inform SPI of the new

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

I also agree to everything. With am extra point. 2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper : >> *) SPI >> - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone >> else is interested let us know) >> - inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project rules >> -

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Sounds good to me! On 22/05/2017 08:40, John Crispin wrote: Hi, here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. John *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor)

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the only