In uClibc-ng O_PATH and O_DIRECTORY are only defined if _GNU_SOURCE is
defined.
So explicitly define _GNU_SOURCE in sources that use O_PATH and
O_DIRECTORY.
Without that extra definition that's what happens when building procd.
utils/utils.c:
->8--
...
Hi,
is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
John
On 23/05/2016 19:57, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> In uClibc-ng O_PATH and O_DIRECTORY are only defined if _GNU_SOURCE is
> defined.
>
> So explicitly define _GNU_SOURCE in sources that use O_PATH and
> O_DIRECTORY.
On 2016-05-23 20:03, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
At least O_PATH is Linux specific, so defining _GNU_SOURCE makes sense.
- Felix
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Hi John,
John Crispin wrote,
> Hi,
> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
I think it isn't b0rked.
It was added for ARM GNU libc here under #ifdef __USE_GNU:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/bits/fcntl.h;h=aa2d36ca80f
On 23/05/2016 20:12, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi John,
> John Crispin wrote,
>
>> Hi,
>> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
>
> I think it isn't b0rked.
> It was added for ARM GNU libc here under #ifdef __USE_GNU:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=b
John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 23/05/2016 20:12, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Hi John,
> > John Crispin wrote,
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
> >
> > I think it isn't b0rked.
> > It was added for ARM GNU libc here under #ifdef __USE_GNU:
>
Hi Karl,
Karl Palsson wrote,
>
> John Crispin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/05/2016 20:12, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > > Hi John,
> > > John Crispin wrote,
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ?
> > >
> > > I think it isn't b0rked.
> > > It w
Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >
> > This still doesn't work on the uclibc in openwrt-CC branch. The
> > O_PATH definitions are in asm-generic/fcntl.h, which can be
> > included via linux/fcntl.h, _GNU_SOURCE doesn't get this pulled
> > in though.
> >
> > I attempted to add includes for linux/fcntl
On 02/06/2016 13:03, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>>
>>> This still doesn't work on the uclibc in openwrt-CC branch. The
>>> O_PATH definitions are in asm-generic/fcntl.h, which can be
>>> included via linux/fcntl.h, _GNU_SOURCE doesn't get this pulled
>>> in though.
>>>
>>
