Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH]fstools: added xfs and f2fs to block-mount

2016-10-17 Thread John Crispin
On 17/10/2016 17:37, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > On 10/17/2016 04:31 PM, John Crispin wrote: >>> I'm going to add xfs support to other fstools components in a following >>> patch. >> >> please explain what this would consist of. i was about to merge your >> patch but your comments make me think

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH]fstools: added xfs and f2fs to block-mount

2016-10-17 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 10/17/2016 04:31 PM, John Crispin wrote: >> I'm going to add xfs support to other fstools components in a following >> patch. > > please explain what this would consist of. i was about to merge your > patch but your comments make me think it is incomplete. > Sorry for the confusion. This pat

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH]fstools: added xfs and f2fs to block-mount

2016-10-17 Thread John Crispin
On 16/10/2016 16:23, Alberto Bursi wrote: > Damn, while this patch adds only partial xfs support to fstools (it > allows to mount xfs by block mount). > why only partial ? > Most of fstools have code to use f2fs too already so the fact that block > mount couldn't mount f2fs is 100% a bug and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH]fstools: added xfs and f2fs to block-mount

2016-10-16 Thread Alberto Bursi
Damn, while this patch adds only partial xfs support to fstools (it allows to mount xfs by block mount). Most of fstools have code to use f2fs too already so the fact that block mount couldn't mount f2fs is 100% a bug and this patch fixes that. I'm going to add xfs support to other fstools comp

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH]fstools: added xfs and f2fs to block-mount

2016-10-15 Thread Alberto Bursi
added the code to recognize the filesystem checkers for xfs and f2fs added xfs and f2fs to the filesystem whitelist of block. Signed-off-by: Alberto Bursi - --- fstools/block.c 2016-10-15 19:15:31.916714011 +0200 +++ fstools/block.c 2016-10-15 19:22:44.164702448 +0200 @@ -702,6 +702,