Thank you. I think we ought to demand a product recall for everything Intel.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
AFAIK AMD processors that don't need that are from Zen onwards. Older
ones are impacted.
-Alberto
On 08/01/2018 12:27, Nick Lowe wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I am not following :-) For AMD, there should not be a tradeoff as
there is no need for the page table isolation.
Regards,
Nick
On Mon, Jan 8,
Sorry, it was back ported to 4.9.75 :-)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> It looks like PCID and INVPCID support is likely to be back ported to
> the 4.9.76 Linux Kernel: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10143225/
It looks like PCID and INVPCID support is likely to be back ported to
the 4.9.76 Linux Kernel: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10143225/
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Hi all,
I am a moron, I missed:
+skip:
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
+ goto disable;
It uses a different path...
Regards,
NIck
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I am not following :-) For AMD, there should not be a
Hi Kevin,
I am not following :-) For AMD, there should not be a tradeoff as
there is no need for the page table isolation.
Regards,
Nick
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 11:12, Nick Lowe
> On 8 Jan 2018, at 11:12, Nick Lowe wrote:
>
> Agreed. So this will seemingly regress something like an APU2 and
> therefore probably should not be merged to LEDE as-is?
I’ll let an adult decide the performance/security tradeoff.
signature.asc
Description: Message
Citeren Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant :
On 8 Jan 2018, at 11:04, Nick Lowe wrote:
Hi,
Where in 4.9.75 does it avoid the page table isolation mitigation for AMD?
Committed to the 4.14 and 4.15 branch is:
Agreed. So this will seemingly regress something like an APU2 and
therefore probably should not be merged to LEDE as-is?
Nick
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 11:04, Nick Lowe wrote:
>>
> On 8 Jan 2018, at 11:04, Nick Lowe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Where in 4.9.75 does it avoid the page table isolation mitigation for AMD?
>
> Committed to the 4.14 and 4.15 branch is:
>
>
Hi,
Where in 4.9.75 does it avoid the page table isolation mitigation for AMD?
Committed to the 4.14 and 4.15 branch is:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v4.15-rc7=694d99d40972f12e59a3696effee8a376b79d7c8
X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE becomes
Tested-by: Koen Vandeputte
Targets: cns3xxx, imx6
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Refresh patches
Fixes: CVE-2017-5754 aka Meltdown
Tested-on: ar71xx Archer C7 v2
Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
---
include/kernel-version.mk| 4 ++--
...sb-xhci-add-firmware-loader-for-uPD720201-and-uPD72.patch | 6
13 matches
Mail list logo