Hi,
Zoltan HERPAI schrieb am 02.11.2017 um 13:20:
> For the sake of full transparency, Imre and me was not part of the vote,
> as that was sent to lede-adm, without including openwrt-hackers or
> openwrt-devel.
and your PATCH v2 didn't go to lede-adm.
a suggestion from a simple community member:
Hi Hauke,
Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 10/26/2017 09:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
Hannu Nyman writes:
Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
+ -
+ * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
+ * 2 oz. Pineapple Juic
On 10/26/2017 09:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Hannu Nyman writes:
>
>> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
>>> + -
>>> + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
>>> + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
>>
Philip Prindeville wrote on 28.10.2017 23:20:
Hi all,
Does it seem to anyone else that we’re making this more complicated than it
needs to be?
If one of the goals we’re going for from here on out is “equality”, then a
basic litmus test to be applied to any action might be “does this get us cl
Hi all,
Does it seem to anyone else that we’re making this more complicated than it
needs to be?
If one of the goals we’re going for from here on out is “equality”, then a
basic litmus test to be applied to any action might be “does this get us closer
to a level playing field, or further away”
Dear Florian,
Seems the discussion that was raised on using a personal openwrt address in a
SOB does not do much good so far and it is certainly not my intention to go
against rule #12; I would be sorry if I did. The question I raised is, although
about personal addresses, absolutely not aimed
On 10/27/2017 02:34 AM, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
> Dear Imre,
>
> On the info for the version of the patch: my error, must have overlooked the
> included version info, it is indeed included.
>
> About the use of openwrt email addresses in the SOB:
> This has been discussed before, and the argume
Dear Imre,
On the info for the version of the patch: my error, must have overlooked the
included version info, it is indeed included.
About the use of openwrt email addresses in the SOB:
This has been discussed before, and the arguments against using an openwrt mail
address as a personal addres
Hannu Nyman wrote:
> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
> > + -
> > + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
> > + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
> > + * 2 oz. Grapefruit Juice ice, stir well.
On 10/26/2017 9:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
"Blurry fish butt" I think was (until recently) a codename for the linux kernel.
It's just Torvalds making fun of codenames, the linux kernel "codename"
isn't used anywhere outside of Torvalds posts.
-Alberto
___
Hannu Nyman writes:
> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
>> + -
>> + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
>> + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
>> + * 2 oz. Grapefruit Juice ice, stir well.
>>
Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
+ -
+ * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
+ * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
+ * 2 oz. Grapefruit Juice ice, stir well.
+ * 2 oz. Cranberry Juice
+ ---
Please, could you add some info on what has changed with the new version of the
patch ?
And, it would be appreciated when the SOB would not use an openwrt.org mail
address (assuming Imre has another suitable mail available).
Paul
> Op 26 okt. 2017, om 17:41 heeft Zoltan HERPAI het volgende
>
Given that we've decided to sail under the same flag for
the benefit of the whole community, and acknowledge the
achievements of the LEDE project, let's start the final
steps of the merge.
The git and other sources are untouched until the infra merge.
v2: - dismiss bugtracker and forum change
14 matches
Mail list logo
