Hi Sven,
first of all I would like to thank you and your colleagues for your great work
and upstreaming of the support for all OpenMesh devices, opensourcing the
ap51-flash utils etc.
But on the other hand I'm wondering how should I upload my custom LEDE image
to my recently purchased OM5P-AC dev
Petr Štetiar [2016-11-14 14:24:48]:
> The only sane way of fixing this is to dump the private keys out of the
> U-Boot and patch the ap51-flash so the LEDE users are able to sign their own
> LEDE or any other custom OS images and use the HW as they wish.
I was corrected by someone who would like
Judging by how easy it was in the beggining to fool Android bootloaders into
doing stupid stuff, I wouldn't be too worried - granted that we get the right
people interested. This however is a substandard solution unfortunately..
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 16:59, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Petr Štetiar
[this is a rather odd change of topic]
On Montag, 14. November 2016 14:24:48 CET Petr Štetiar wrote:
[...]
> But on the other hand I'm wondering how should I upload my custom LEDE image
> to my recently purchased OM5P-AC device as the U-Boot there is locked down and
> accepts only signed OS im
Sven Eckelmann [2016-11-15 09:32:18]:
Hi,
> I was told that OpenMesh is also shipping an already unlocked version of it in
> regions which don't requires closed down versions. They called it
> "(International Version)".
quoting from Cloudtrax help portal[1]:
"For international customers, pleas
Hey Petr,
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:29:40 AM CET Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Sven Eckelmann [2016-11-15 09:32:18]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I was told that OpenMesh is also shipping an already unlocked version of
> > it in regions which don't requires closed down versions. They called it
> > "(Internatio
Simon Wunderlich [2016-11-15 11:51:54]:
> Hey Petr,
Hi!
> We don't have any influence on the production decisions, though.
sure, I'm not blaming any of you, I understand this, it's very hard :-)
> But as Sven said, please contact customer support. I'm sure they will find a
> solution for you
Well, we are. We can't change the fact that the devices need to be locked to
be sold in the US. But if you google a little, you will find a lot of patches
for various Open Source projects signed by @open-mesh.com mail addresses
(LEDE, Linux, hostapd, etc) ... Feel free to compare that with other
Hi David,
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:49:40 PM CET David Lang wrote:
> > Well, we are. We can't change the fact that the devices need to be locked
> > to be sold in the US. But if you google a little, you will find a lot of
> > patches for various Open Source projects signed by @open-mesh.com
The linked document below is the same document we attacked, I thought
successfully, last year,
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2993112/security/vint-cerf-and-260-experts-give-fcc-a-plan-to-secure-wi-fi-routers.html
with the ultimate response from the fcc being
https://www.fcc.gov/news-event
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
Hi David,
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:49:40 PM CET David Lang wrote:
Well, we are. We can't change the fact that the devices need to be locked
to be sold in the US. But if you google a little, you will find a lot of
patches for various Open Sour
11 matches
Mail list logo