On 02/18/2017 11:12 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 02/18/2017 03:49 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I fixed the "OFF" error and the package size handling.
>>
>> Updated patches are:
>>
>> https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
>> https://git.lede-project.org/b04957d.patch
>>
On 02/18/2017 03:49 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I fixed the "OFF" error and the package size handling.
>
> Updated patches are:
>
> https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
> https://git.lede-project.org/b04957d.patch
>
> ~ Jo
>
Ok, now it is not sluggish, and installing
Hi again,
I fixed the "OFF" error and the package size handling.
Updated patches are:
https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
https://git.lede-project.org/b04957d.patch
~ Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Hi Alberto,
thanks for the feedback! The "OFF" thing sounds like a cmake artifact, will
investigate.
Will also verify the size handling later today.
~ Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
On 02/17/2017 08:14 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> my previous change was incomplete, please use the following two changes
> for testing:
>
> https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
> https://git.lede-project.org/e9bd98e.patch
>
>
> Bye,
> Jo
>
Ok, flashed on my ar71xx device.
On 02/17/2017 08:14 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> my previous change was incomplete, please use the following two changes
> for testing:
>
> https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
> https://git.lede-project.org/e9bd98e.patch
>
>
> Bye,
> Jo
>
I can't seem to apply the second
Hi again,
my previous change was incomplete, please use the following two changes
for testing:
https://git.lede-project.org/71ab6d6.patch
https://git.lede-project.org/e9bd98e.patch
Bye,
Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Hi list,
I just pushed an experimental commit to my staging tree which updates
opkg to an improved custom LEDE fork [1] which attempts to minimize the
memory usage requirements to make opkg usable on low memory devices again.
Some preliminary testing on virtual and physical x86/64 targets showed
