On 17 February 2017 at 17:56, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 17 February 2017 at 16:06, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> On 17 February 2017 at 15:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2017 at 15:14, Jonas Gorski wrote:
If that isn't enough you could also create a
KernelPackage/ssb/brcm47xx (s
On 17 February 2017 at 16:06, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 17 February 2017 at 15:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 17 February 2017 at 15:14, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2017 at 14:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I was doing some fun experiments with ssb/bcma/b43 as a research based on:
On 17 February 2017 at 15:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 17 February 2017 at 15:14, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> On 17 February 2017 at 14:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> I was doing some fun experiments with ssb/bcma/b43 as a research based on:
>>> [PATCH RFC] kernel: allow selecting kmod-ssb on TARGET_b
On 17 February 2017 at 15:14, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 17 February 2017 at 14:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> I was doing some fun experiments with ssb/bcma/b43 as a research based on:
>> [PATCH RFC] kernel: allow selecting kmod-ssb on TARGET_brcm47xx_mips74k
>>
>> I was trying to build 2 variants of
Hi,
On 17 February 2017 at 14:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> I was doing some fun experiments with ssb/bcma/b43 as a research based on:
> [PATCH RFC] kernel: allow selecting kmod-ssb on TARGET_brcm47xx_mips74k
>
> I was trying to build 2 variants of ssb package and 2 variants of b43
> package.
> It d
I was doing some fun experiments with ssb/bcma/b43 as a research based on:
[PATCH RFC] kernel: allow selecting kmod-ssb on TARGET_brcm47xx_mips74k
I was trying to build 2 variants of ssb package and 2 variants of b43 package.
It didn't work, most likely because of the way PROVIDES is handled. I s
