Re: [LEDE-DEV] s/dnsmasq/unbound+odhcpd/

2017-01-21 Thread Eric Luehrsen
Its more of having time to gather common wants and establish sane limits on the scope. Stuff like this can get out of control in feature creep. Good structure is necessary for future maintenance and LuCI. Also its a new feature in 1.6.0 and I want to test it manually first and have yay/nay

Re: [LEDE-DEV] s/dnsmasq/unbound+odhcpd/

2017-01-20 Thread Eric Luehrsen
>>>Sound interesting. Can it do multiple instances? (1) The UCI scripts are not configured for instances, but ... (2) It wouldn't be a good idea. Recursive servers keep a lot of infrastructure cache with the zone data. This grows with DNSSEC. Lame paths (broken DSKEY chains) and slow

Re: [LEDE-DEV] s/dnsmasq/unbound+odhcpd/

2017-01-20 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:34:45 +0100 Dan Lüdtke wrote: > Hi everyone, > > i built LEDE without dnsmasq but with odhcp instead. Mainly out of > curiosity and to test a recent PR by Eric Luehrsen regarding > unbound+odhcp. Sound interesting. Can it do multiple instances? > > C)

[LEDE-DEV] s/dnsmasq/unbound+odhcpd/

2017-01-19 Thread Dan Lüdtke
Hi everyone, i built LEDE without dnsmasq but with odhcp instead. Mainly out of curiosity and to test a recent PR by Eric Luehrsen regarding unbound+odhcp. Just a couple of questions to help me understand why things are the way they are: A) In ifaces.lua, it says "Display DNS settings if