On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:25 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Sorry, missed confirming that it works perfectly.
>
> I just tested today with the recent LEDE 17.01.3, and it works perfectly as
> well.
Thanks for the feedback
Hans
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
Hi Hans,
Sorry, missed confirming that it works perfectly.
I just tested today with the recent LEDE 17.01.3, and it works perfectly as
well.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: Hans Dedecker
Responder a:
Fecha: domingo, 10
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
> Ah even better, I thought 17.01.2 was not including the right CLAT (NAT46)
> stuff.
>
> So, I will try that then:
>
>
Ah even better, I thought 17.01.2 was not including the right CLAT (NAT46)
stuff.
So, I will try that then:
http://downloads.lede-project.org/releases/17.01.2/targets/ramips/mt7621/lede-17.01.2-ramips-mt7621-sk-wb8-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
Right?
Or do you mean I use the snapshot and then opkg
Hi all,
I just saw in github that 464xlat.sh has been modified on June 2.
I’m not sure if that means that 464XLAT is already working if I use a snapshot,
for example:
http://downloads.lede-project.org/snapshots/targets/ramips/mt7621/lede-ramips-mt7621-sk-wb8-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
I’m doing
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:24 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I’m now a bit more confused with your comment that it doesn’t work in LEDE,
> because this afternoon, finally I got it working.
>
> Let me explain all the
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:23 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> I believe you’re the maintainer of 464XLAT. I want to do demonstrations of
> OpenWRT/LEDE in scenarios where you run out of IPv4 addresses for the WAN
> links.
>
> Sorry to write you