On 23 February 2017 at 22:35, Stijn Segers
wrote:
> Updates the 17.01 kernel to .51.
>
> Compile-tested on:
> * ar71xx
> * ramips/mt7621
> * x86/64
>
> Run-tested on:
> * ar71xx
> * ramips/mt7621
>
> Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers
Why not the common way? Update kernel in master & cherry-pick to
led
Hi Rafal,
I talked this through with jow, a lot of targets have already dropped
4.4 support in trunk, which makes backporting 4.4 updates to 17.01
non-trivial.
He was OK with me sending in a patch just for 17.01.
Cheers
Stijn
Op do, 23 feb 2017 om 10:44 , schreef Rafał Miłecki
:
On 23 Fe
please also prepare a separate patch for trunk, so we canmerge both,
even if they are different patches
John
On 24/02/2017 08:27, Stijn Segers wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
>
> I talked this through with jow, a lot of targets have already dropped
> 4.4 support in trunk, which makes backporting 4.4
please also prepare a separate patch for trunk, so we canmerge both,
even if they are different patches
John
Hi John,
Will do so this evening (CET), no access to my system from work.
Cheers
Stijn
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.in
This should be suitable:
https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/874
Kevin
On 24/02/17 08:24, Stijn Segers wrote:
please also prepare a separate patch for trunk, so we canmerge both,
even if they are different patches
John
Hi John,
Will do so this evening (CET), no access to my sys
So...
I have been running on 4.4.51 on a few days now but it looks like
there's some weird stuff going on on my DIR-860L... I don't know if
this is merely a timeline coincidence or if it's something linked to
.51 (or .50).
I checked its uptime and it reported < 2h (flashed it two days ago),
Op za, 25 feb 2017 om 9:02 , schreef Stijn Segers
:
So...
I have been running on 4.4.51 on a few days now but it looks like
there's some weird stuff going on on my DIR-860L... I don't know if
this is merely a timeline coincidence or if it's something linked to
.51 (or .50).
I checked its u
i know it's an old message,
i have another router with mediatek processor and it has similar
behavior when i enable smart queue management , disabling it the problem
is solved
Il 25/02/2017 21:02, Stijn Segers ha scritto:
So...
I have been running on 4.4.51 on a few days now but it looks li
