>>> "UB" == Uwe Brauer writes:
Tobias,
Out of curiosity (I am not so acquainted with ledger)
You made the following comment
,
| However, you understandably would like to avoid the manual computations
| needed with this process. The key to that is to
| 1. use only a single account for lia
* Muke Tever [2022-01-03 18:54]:
> Oh, I see the problem, and I guess it's a little different than I
> thought. So amount and market(amount) doesn't 'balance' to zero,
> but they do 'balance' in the sense that ledger doesn't complain
> about it being unbalanced, if they exist as a regular transac
On Tuesday, January 4, 2022 at 2:32:20 AM UTC-8 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Muke Tever [2022-01-03 18:54]:
> > Oh, I see the problem, and I guess it's a little different than I
> > thought. So amount and market(amount) doesn't 'balance' to zero,
> > but they do 'balance' in the sense that ledg
> One thing I'm running into - - - invoicing is about AR (accounts receivable).
> Ledger does a very very nice job of AP (accounts payable) but there is
> one thing both share is that there comes a need for a numbering scheme.
> Like transaction AP # 0245078 refers to the invoice on 2021.12.23
> pr
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:02 AM Kent R. Spillner wrote:
>
> > One thing I'm running into - - - invoicing is about AR (accounts
> > receivable).
> > Ledger does a very very nice job of AP (accounts payable) but there is
> > one thing both share is that there comes a need for a numbering scheme.
>