Hi David;
In general, you will find little disagreement from our team. We are
expecting to implement UI templating in 1.3 though not all the UI may
be moved to the new system for some time. There are some
technological and practical challenges involved in the decision of
exactly what and how muc
On 11/6/06, David Ratte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, since your plan is to rewrite a bunch of stuff anyway, and 'sole-source'
> postgres, I'd like to drop in my two cents on one of my pet peeves from
> SQL-ledger (as background I've been using SQL-ledger since V1.8.3 and have
> been generally h
On Sunday 05 November 2006 14:53, Christopher Murtagh wrote on the
sql-ledger-users list:
> We're moving as much
> of the code as we can to CPAN modules where appropriate, re-factoring
> most of the code structure, trying to separate UI from logic even
> further, enhancing for security best-pract
Hi all;
I am wondering what people expect the database size for smaller
customers to be. I have one customer who over the space of two years
has just hit the 1M record mark in acc_trans (when 1.2 is released I
will be migrating them to LSMB, perhaps even in late beta). Wondering
what others' exp
Correct.
On 11/6/06, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > I dunno. I think there are plenty of reasons not to do this also.
> > There are pro's and cons but the basic issue is that businesses are
> > supposed to be separate entities.
>
> I presume you're talking about schema-per-LSMB-instance rathe
Chris,
> I dunno. I think there are plenty of reasons not to do this also.
> There are pro's and cons but the basic issue is that businesses are
> supposed to be separate entities.
I presume you're talking about schema-per-LSMB-instance rather than
schema-for-users here.
--
Josh Berkus
Postg
