Certainly you could run both sets through perltidy before reviewing
the diffs. I think you will find, however, that there are a *lot*
more changes than are apparent on the surface.
In particular, the move to parameterized SQL queries is a big one.
Note also that, our codebase is actually smaller
On 12/5/06, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to troll, but:
>
> Is LedgerSMB planning to incorporate the new features SQL-Ledger-2.7 beta,
> scheduled for release mid December 2006?
Seems like SQL-Ledger 2.8 has been postponed (2.7 is the beta for
2.8). There is no longer any date
Not to troll, but:
Is LedgerSMB planning to incorporate the new features SQL-Ledger-2.7 beta,
scheduled for release mid December 2006?
This is more or less the motivation for my previous question about
diff-minimzation. But that's just the technical work of incorporating the
changes.
My underly
As an evaluation step, I've been looking at diffs of SQL-Ledger releases to the
current ledger-smb trunk.
Worthwhile improvements such as whitespace reorganization, file moves, etc. do
improve the ledger-smb codebase, but they also make diff comparison less
viable, which accelerates divergence.
W
