Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

On 5/31/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, like 'Sell', ie a vendor, or 'Buy' ie a customer. That is what I am > saying. Except that it is not. Sell is a task performed just as Buy is. A vendor or customer is a class of entity. Agreed. I meant to say this, replying to what

[Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger Corrections in Reconciliation

I was bouncing around an idea around with regards to necessary corrections to the ledger during statement reconciliation. In essence, I'd like to propose that, when we restrict update/delete on acc_trans, that the reverse/recreate function request and potentially enforce the requirement for

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

David Tangye wrote: > > > On 5/30/07, *Chris Travers* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Ok. Think of an entity as a "legal person" (corporate or natural) and > a contact as a "natural person." > > > Yes, I assume that a 'Contact' is a contact for an Entity.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

On 5/30/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok. Think of an entity as a "legal person" (corporate or natural) and a contact as a "natural person." Yes, I assume that a 'Contact' is a contact for an Entity. So Chris Travers can be the contact for Chris Travers. As a physical design