Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Chris Travers
On 6/20/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > contacts with a structured history trail > > (...) > > I think it's helpful to review the > > kind of "use cases" that I sketched out and perhaps dream up some more - > > I think it helps figure out if w

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
--- Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > contacts with a structured history trail > (...) > I think it's helpful to review the > kind of "use cases" that I sketched out and perhaps dream up some more - > I think it helps figure out if we have got the model right if we see > that we can do all the o

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Ed W
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1. An argument could even be made that an invoice, once produced, should become an opaque blob of data. I can't think of any reason to modify a produced invoice. Any amending of an invoice should surely create a new, separate documen

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Chris Travers
On 6/20/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > +1. An argument could even be made that an invoice, once produced, > > should become an opaque blob of data. I can't think of any reason to > > modify a produced invoice. Any amending of an invoice should

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +1. An argument could even be made that an invoice, once produced, > should become an opaque blob of data. I can't think of any reason to > modify a produced invoice. Any amending of an invoice should surely > create a new, separate document? True, that rev

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread richard
Quoting Shaun Laughey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 to Stroller - every good system I've used, designed or pleased to pay > for has had the invoice address and other details recorded against the > invoice not the customer. > > It may copy them from the customer at invoice time but after that they >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Shaun Laughey
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 11:52 +0100, Stroller wrote: > On 20 Jun 2007, at 06:04, Chris Travers wrote: > > ... > > I understand what you are saying, but I still disagree. Instead I > > think we are talking two different things. > > > > 1) Invoices need to be entirely self-contained. They need to sto

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] For those interested in the CRM/Entity management

2007-06-20 Thread Stroller
On 20 Jun 2007, at 06:04, Chris Travers wrote: > ... > I understand what you are saying, but I still disagree. Instead I > think we are talking two different things. > > 1) Invoices need to be entirely self-contained. They need to store > all information required to recreate and track them. We