Steve Redler IV wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
>> However, I am wondering if it would be better to have multi- rather
>> than dual- unit support. I.e. one vendor may sell an item in 5lb
>> cases, while another vendor may sell them in 10lb cases. Of one could
>> create multiple purchase unit
On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure that a change at line 322 in IR.pm can't solve the bug 1748895.
> To solve this bug a extra update is needed.
> I added this : "$form->update_balance( $dbh, "invoice", "allocated",
> qq|id = $invoice_id|, $qty );" at line 393.
Wrong b
Yes.
Thank you.
Chris Travers wrote:
> BTW you are correct on the patch you submitted :-) I am applying the
> patch now and putting through some final testing.
>
> Is it OK to include your email in the CONTRIBUTORS file?
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
>
> On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTEC
BTW you are correct on the patch you submitted :-) I am applying the
patch now and putting through some final testing.
Is it OK to include your email in the CONTRIBUTORS file?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure that a change at line 322 in
On 7/7/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sure that a change at line 322 in IR.pm can't solve the bug 1748895.
> > To solve this bug a extra update is needed.
> > I added this : "$form->update_balance( $dbh, "invoice", "allocat
I'm sure that a change at line 322 in IR.pm can't solve the bug 1748895.
To solve this bug a extra update is needed.
I added this : "$form->update_balance( $dbh, "invoice", "allocated",
qq|id = $invoice_id|, $qty );" at line 393.
The problem is that when a ap invoice is posted and COGS are alloc
On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's true I reported a bug at COGS, but it was a diffrent one. :)
> I also send the patch for that bug.
I am still evaluating what exactly is going on with that one. I just
want to understand the patch before I apply it (and this code isn't
al
It's true I reported a bug at COGS, but it was a diffrent one. :)
I also send the patch for that bug.
As you suspected this bugs are also in sqlledger.
Then I will fill in another bug report for what we discussed.
I will send a patch for the solution using GAAP(I prefer respecting GAAP
also).
And
On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right, my solution is not GAAP-compliant.
>
> I'll try then to define why COGS is wrong in my opinion.
> 1) I create a new product.
> 2) I insert a ap invoice witch contains a quantity of 1 from that
> product at a price X.
> 3) I insert
You are right, my solution is not GAAP-compliant.
I'll try then to define why COGS is wrong in my opinion.
1) I create a new product.
2) I insert a ap invoice witch contains a quantity of 1 from that
product at a price X.
3) I insert a ap invoice witch contains a quantity of -1 from that
product
On 7/7/07, Victor Sterpu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must implement a way to repost invoices, mentaining the correct COGS.
> I'm thinking to do this by creating a new table where too keep all the
> necesary information.
> Are you interested in adding this functionality in ledgersmb?
No. Repost
I must implement a way to repost invoices, mentaining the correct COGS.
I'm thinking to do this by creating a new table where too keep all the
necesary information.
Are you interested in adding this functionality in ledgersmb?
Why do I need to repost a invoice?
Suppose there is a wrong date, invo
Chris Travers wrote:
> However, I am wondering if it would be better to have multi- rather
> than dual- unit support. I.e. one vendor may sell an item in 5lb
> cases, while another vendor may sell them in 10lb cases. Of one could
> create multiple purchase unit types with conversions, then that
On 7/7/07, Steve Redler IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm considering adding dual units of measure to Leger SMB and I am
> curious if anyone else has started to work on this.
Not that I am aware of. This would certainly be of interest to a lot
of LSMB users. The inability to handle different u
On 7/6/07, Ho-Sheng Hsiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> > Yes it has, but let me save you the trouble. This pretty much sums up
> > the approach:
> > http://www.ledgersmb.org/node/41
>
> Thanks.
>
> Are you metatrontech on #ledgersmb? He gave me the link to this.
>
Ye
I'm considering adding dual units of measure to Leger SMB and I am
curious if anyone else has started to work on this. It would be used by
a meat manufacturing plant, where products are ordered by the piece, but
sold by the pound. Each item would have a conversion factor to convert
between the 2 un
16 matches
Mail list logo
